Thursday, 28 September 2017
Footnotes: September 2017
Wednesday, 23 November 2016
Book Review: Whose Body? by Dorothy L. Sayers
This is the first in Dorothy Sayers' Lord Peter Wimsey mystery series, but the second that I have read. Gaudy Night
was really good but, since many people consider it the best in the
series, I was worried that this book wouldn't live up to it; especially
as GN focuses mostly on Harriet Vane, who doesn't appear in this book,
and I wasn't sure I would enjoy this as much with only Peter. I needn't
have worried though; although this isn't quite as good, it's definitely
still very enjoyable.
There are a few offensive comments made by characters in the book, particularly with regards to Jewish people, which has caused some controversy; although the impression I got was that these reflected the views of the characters saying them (and of many people at the time the book was written), and are not necessarily those of the author. Other than that, I can't think of many things I didn't like about this book.
Overall, this was a great book, and I'm looking forward to reading the rest of the series.
Sunday, 18 September 2016
Book Review: Gaudy Night by Dorothy L. Sayers
This is the first of Dorothy Sayers'
Lord Peter Wimsey books that I've read. Although Peter is the series'
main character, it takes him a while to appear in this book - the main
character is Harriet Vane, a friend of his who has been involved in some
of his previous cases, who is called back to her (fictional) old Oxford
college, Shrewsbury, to investigate a series of unusual occurrences,
including anonymous letters sent to residents of the college and other
unsavoury happenings.
I enjoyed the mystery itself; it was unusual (in not being a murder
mystery, or a straightforward crime), and I definitely didn't see the
ending coming - looking back, there were some clues, so it might have
been possible to have had a guess at the culprit, but I obviously wasn't
paying enough attention.
I also liked the characters a lot and the development of Harriet's and
Peter's relationship was really well done - although this book does rely
on some backstory in the previous novels I was able to pick up enough
of what had happened to understand what was going on, although I may
have missed some details - it would probably be better to have read the
previous books in which Harriet appears in first (which I do intend to
do). The secondary characters I felt were also very well drawn; although
I did find it hard at times to keep track of who was who - since most
of the characters are just referred to as Miss X, it was hard to
remember who they all were. But most of them were interesting and felt
real.
From a historical viewpoint, it was interesting to get a glimpse of what
university life was like for women at that time and what has (and
hasn't) changed. By this time the idea of women going to university was
accepted by most people (in England they started going in the late
1800s, and were first allowed to get degrees in 1920), but the students
and staff at the college still have to face sexism and disapproval from a
significant number of people, and preserving the reputation of the
college is very important - because if the college is made to look bad
then it reflects on women's education in general. This is of course
important in the story as it is why the events going on are so dangerous
for the college, and why they ask Harriet to investigate, not wanting
to attract outside attention by applying to professional detectives or
the police.
-
It's the last day of June! I haven't done a monthly recap post before but I think it's a good way to keep track of what I...
-
Summary (from Goodreads): Ruth and her beloved brother Philip find solace in the expanse of the Tanglewoods' property. There they es...
-
Hamlette at Hamlette's Soliloquy is hosting I Love Austen Week this week - a week dedicated to all things Jane Austen! Be sure to che...


